TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

GroupLens Lab

Is this your requester account?
University of Minnesota
  • Overview
  • Reviews 84
  • HITs 16

GroupLens Lab Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

GroupLens Lab Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

TheWerkz Average Pace
Reviews: 210
Points: 1,130
Ratings: 111
Academic survey about opinions on algorithm prediction on recidivism - $2.00 +3.40 bonus Confirmed!

Good

Unrated

Approved

$15.19 / hour

00:21:20 / completion time

Pros

Play with an app that predicts recidivism of criminals.
It's actually pretty interesting to play with.
It's not the usual survey!
I'm rating as good payment since I'm expecting over $3.00 in bonus payment too, they don't give the exact amount at the conclusion, but, it's up to $3.60 for not missing any questions.

Cons

There was a small amount of writing to state why you preferred one option over the other options.
They don't state the exact bonus amount at the conclusion.
You'll lose any bonus if you miss an A/C!
Not the greatest documentation for one part, just figure it out for yourself kinda stuff...

Advice to Requester

Please calculate the bonus and display it at the end of the experiment.
Jul 25, 2019

Alexandra in VT Average Pace
Reviews: 8,350
Points: 5,826
Ratings: 671
Academic survey about opinions on algorithm prediction on recidivism - $2.00 +3.60 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$18.79 / hour

00:17:53 / completion time

Pros

up to $5.60 in bonuses. I am fairly positive that I earned the whole thing, and I don't think it would be hard to maximize the bonus, but just to be sure I have set it to 0. However, with the full bonus, the hourly wage would be $25.50, so this is definitely worth it if the bonus pays.
Interesting concept

Cons

Jul 24, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Penelope Fast Reader
Reviews: 10,545
Points: 10,999
Ratings: 2,846
[Academic survey] Determine gender of biographical articles (30-40min, max pay 10.25) - $4.00 +0.01 bonus

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$7.30 / hour

00:32:58 / completion time

Pros

Bonus up to $6.25.

Cons

Bonus done in such a way that you are unlikely to actually get anything substantial. 10 cents per word (up to 10) per article and 25 cents per task based on aggregate data from other workers. I'm not sure why this school (Carnegie Mellon) has started putting out such low-paying hits with iffy and/or hard to get bonuses.
Apr 27, 2020 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see GroupLens Lab's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

GroupLens Lab


A1IVOQZ9SUM9C MTurk Search Contact Requester
Top Collaborating Institutions

Carnegie Mellon University

Recently Reviewed HITs


(Must be using Chrome) Voice Search Survey
(Must be using Chrome) Voice Search Survey [10 min]
(Must be using Chrome) Voice Search Survey [15 min]
[Academic survey] Determine gender of biographical articles (30-40min, max pay 10.25)
[Timed HIT, start right away] Chat with other users (You must join within 5 minutes to be approved)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact